Changing Trends in Performance Management
The objective of
performance measurements have changed over past few decades. Traditional
performance measures based on productivity are no longer applicable or
representative of the information needs of today's competitive global market.
Alternative performance systems have been proposed that range from time as the
basis of all measures to the integration of a variety of performance measures.
Reviews and analyses the limitations of traditional approaches to performance
measurement as well as the emerging trends in performance measurement system
development. Out of many, under mention performance measurement system is briefly
discussed.
An integrated dynamic performance measurement system (IDPMS)
Until the 1980s organizations trusted exclusively
on performance measurement systems based on traditional cost accounting systems
to control, monitor, and improve their operations. However, it has been shown
that these systems do not capture the relevant performance issues for today’s
environment.
Quality
improvement continues to be an important international business strategy as we
enter the twenty‐first
century. Legal requirements, customer demand, market pressure, competition, and
the need for in‐house
quality improvement have driven more trades to become certified with global requirements
such as ISO 9000, ISO 22000, HACCP, GAP, GMP, UTZ and Rainforest Alliance.
Which is expensive, time‐consuming
requires significant dedication and effort.
Integrated dynamic performance measurement
system developed in combination with three main areas of the organization;
- Management
- Process improvement team
- Factory shop floor
To achieve an integrated system, the three areas
are linked through the specification, reporting and dynamic updating of the
defined areas of success, performance measures, and performance standards.
Three tools are incorporated to support and enhance the integration within the
IDPMS.
Conclusion
In today's
globally competitive world it is essential to design products with maximized
functions with minimized costs. The main areas of concern (IDPMS) were the skills, attitudes,
consistency and quality approach of the managers of the organization. One of
the most dreaded tasks managers face is meeting with employees to discuss their
job performance. These meetings present a dilemma for managers. On one hand,
managers need to give constructive criticism so that employees can improve
their performance. However well-designed performance management system is, its
effectiveness mainly depends on the commitment and the skills of managers of
the organization.
References
Andy Neely, Mike
Gregory, Ken Platts, (1995). International journal of operations &
production management
Andrew Gauteau, Brian H. Kleiner, (2001). "Recent
trends in performance measurement systems – the balanced scorecard
approach", Management
Research News, Vol. 24 Issue: 3/4, pp.153-156, https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170110782793
Armstrong’s Hand Book
on Human Resource Management Practice, (2009).
Good referencing and well structured essay...!
ReplyDeleteThank you Manuraja
Deletegood examples with good references
ReplyDelete